Is Russia really getting ready to attack Europe?
NATO members are engaged in massive military escalation against Russia, and are deliberately creating conditions that will inevitably lead to a conflict with Russia
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) has a new report out claiming that “[s]everal Russian financial, economic, and military indicators suggest that Russia is preparing for a large-scale conventional conflict with NATO, not imminently but likely on a shorter timeline than what some Western analysts have initially posited”.
A closer look at the report in question, however, raises serious questions about its claims. There is literally nothing in this so-called report to suggest that Russia is planning to attack NATO — as the wording implies — except for absurd deductions (“Russia is bolstering its military capabilities because it wants to attack NATO”; no it’s bolstering its military capabilities because it’s already indirectly at war with NATO in Ukraine) and unsubstantiated claims by… two NATO members.
That said, of course Russia is “preparing for a large-scale conventional conflict with NATO”, given that NATO members are engaged in massive military escalation against Russia, and are deliberately creating conditions that will inevitably lead to a conflict with Russia — as they did in Ukraine, but on continental scale. Whether this is NATO’s intended outcome or not is beyond the point at this stage (though there is reason to believe that it is).
This is clearly part of a massive Western propaganda campaign aimed at convincing the populations of NATO countries that Russia soon plans to march across Europe — an absurd claim — in order to justify open-ended military build-up (more pocket-lining for the military-industrial complex) and the wider militarisation of societies (i.e., crackdown on democracy at all levels); and when war actually breaks out, having people believe they are the blameless victims of Russian aggression, rather than the victims of their own warmongering elites.
It’s not surprising that the ISW is at the forefront of this propaganda campaign. Since the start of the war in Ukraine, the ISW has become the mainstream media go-to think tank for information and analysis. But the ISW is far from a neutral think tank.
The president and founder of the ISW is Kimberly Kagan, a military historian who is married to Frederick Kagan, who is also a military historian and does work for the ISW. Frederick is a well-known neoconservative — though not as well-known as his brother Robert. In the 1990s, Robert Kagan, along with Bill Kristol (who is on ISW’s board), founded the Project for a New American Century, which played an important role in convincing George W. Bush to invade Iraq.
Moreover, Robert Kagan’s wife — and Kimberly Kagan’s sister-in-law — is none other than Victoria Nuland, the former US State Department official who played a crucial role in orchestrating the 2014 US-backed coup in Ukraine that led to the outbreak of the civil war and kickstarted the disastrous chain of events that led to Russia’s invasion in 2022.
So it goes without saying both Kimberly and Frederick Kagan have very cosy relations with the Pentagon and the US military-industrial complex more in general. Indeed, as Robert Wright explained in an article for Responsible Statecraft, “over the years [the ISW] has gotten funding from various corners of the arms industry — General Dynamics, Raytheon, lesser known defense contractors, and big companies, like General Motors, that aren’t known as defense contractors but do get Pentagon contracts”. And the ISW itself is staffed with neocon war hawks.
So go ahead and use the ISW maps, they’re great. But when it comes to their “analyses”, know that you’re reading propaganda aimed at furthering US imperial interests — which in this specific case means drawing Europe closer and closer to an apocalyptic war with Russia.
Thanks for reading. Putting out high-quality journalism requires constant research, most of which goes unpaid, so if you appreciate my writing please consider upgrading to a paid subscription if you haven’t already. Aside from a fuzzy feeling inside of you, you’ll get access to exclusive articles and commentary such as this one:
Thomas Fazi
Website: thomasfazi.net
Twitter: @battleforeurope
Latest book: The Covid Consensus: The Global Assault on Democracy and the Poor—A Critique from the Left (co-authored with Toby Green)
Recently we had a discussion about the usefulness of the concept of psychopathy to characterize trends in Western elite thinking. Let's consider another psychological concept, the borderline personality. One of its hallmarks is a very poor sense of social causality. While that's not the only salient feature of the syndrome, it refers to the borderline's inability to understand the interaction logics of the culture. In simpler terms, they cannot understand why people hold them responsible for situations that are always someone else's fault. In initial interviews, when a clinician is roughing out a general idea of the patient, for them to depict themselves as always a victim would be a tipoff, suggesting a line of inquiry. The key question would involve figuring out why they so busily project their aggression out onto others and set up another dynamic that has made the rounds, "splitting" into all-good and all-bad object categories.
This fits quite well with the US/NATO understanding of the world. There are, of course, propagandistic reasons for denying that Russia should have any reason to fear the US/NATO. But it does seem that, lacking that simple anchor in reality, there no limits to an image of Russia as a hostile, aggrandizing power. Please recall that George Kennan, who was supposedly such a clearheaded fellow, in his infamous Mr. X essay of 1947 that stoked the Cold War, regarded the Soviets as like a wind-up toy that would keep crashing ahead until it was contained. The US/NATO have never been able to formulate an alternative understanding that steadily acknowledges Russian security interests. Failing to do so, they are free to self-pityingly fantasize, and in the process pull the rest of society along with them. Borderlines are US.