5 Comments
User's avatar
Alan Bleiken's avatar

If the EU interferes in an election, it is not election interference, but if Russia does not interfere in an election, it is still election interference. Odd how that works.

Feral Finster's avatar

It worked in Romania.

M3736's avatar

Yes. On December 6, 2024, the rulers had certainties regarding Russian interference. However, for over a year and three months, they have been struggling to find the former certainties to include them in a justifying report. Without success...

Feral Finster's avatar

Why should they? They already got what they wanted.

SimonB's avatar

Early 2026, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee released a document called "THE FOREIGN CENSORSHIP THREAT, PART II".

It is available to the public at their website.

It includes documentation sources that it obtained from European institutions but are not available to the public.

On page 17 of the above-named document, the subject is how EUC Commission regularly interferes in EU Member State national elections.

It goes into detail on interference methods used for elections in Ireland 2024/2025, Netherlands 2023/2025, Slovakia 2023, Moldova 2024, France 2024, and Romania 2024.

For example, it states: "Nonpublic meeting agendas and readouts show that the European Commission regularly convened meetings of national-level regulators, left-wing NGOs, and platforms prior to elections to discuss which political opinions should be censored."

It also details how the so-called evidence they used to justify cancelling the results of the Romanian elections do not stand up to scrutiny.